Skip to content

January

🐄Spring calving begins📋BISS applications open🏠Indoor feeding & housing

February

🐑Lambing season starts🌾Spring planting begins🐄Peak calving season

March

🌱Turnout to grass🚜Fertiliser spreading📋BISS deadline approaching

April

📋BISS deadline🌱First grazing rotation🐄Breeding season starts

May

🌾First cut silage🐄AI breeding peak🚜Crop spraying

June

🌾Second cut silage📋Nitrates records due💊Dosing cattle

July

🩺TB testing rounds🐄Weaning calves🌱Reseeding paddocks

August

🌾Harvest begins🐑Scanning ewes🌱Autumn grass planning

September

🏆Ploughing Championships🌾Winter crop sowing🐄Autumn calving starts

October

🏠Housing cattle🧪Soil sampling📋Scheme reviews

November

🐄Winter feeding plans🚜Land management📋Tax year planning

December

🐄Pre-calving nutrition📋Year-end records🧪Soil testing
Tools Explained··7 min read

Don't cancel your Teagasc advisor — here's what AI actually does instead

Note: This guide is a starting point. For decisions about grants, animal health, or significant farm investments, always check with your Teagasc advisor or relevant authority.

The short answer is no. But the longer answer is more useful.

The question comes up a lot — usually from farmers who are sceptical of AI to begin with, or from journalists who want a clean narrative. The honest answer doesn't fit either framing neatly.

AI tools are genuinely useful for some of what an advisor does. They are nowhere close to replacing the rest. Here's the split.

What AI can do that used to take advisor time

Explaining scheme rules. Ask ChatGPT to explain the BISS minimum activity requirement in plain English and it does it reasonably well. That used to mean a phone call or waiting for a farm walk. It still means a phone call if the answer is complex — but AI handles the basic orientation faster.

Drafting supporting documents. Standard operating procedures, grant application text, letters to co-ops or banks. ChatGPT drafts these quickly. An advisor might have spent forty minutes on something an AI produces in two — for the farmer to then edit and verify. That's a real time saving on routine paperwork.

Building checklists and frameworks. Pre-application checklists for BISS or ACRES. Monthly health calendars as a starting template. Farm budgeting structures. AI is good at this kind of organised, repeatable output.

Searching and summarising. Rather than reading forty pages of Department of Agriculture guidance, a farmer can paste the relevant section into ChatGPT and ask for a plain-English summary. It works, with the caveat that you verify anything time-sensitive or financially significant against the original.

What AI cannot do and shouldn't try

Know your farm. Your Teagasc advisor has been on your land. They know the south field floods in February. They know your stocking history. They know you had a TB breakdown in 2019 and what that means for your programme now. AI knows nothing about your farm unless you tell it — and even then, it forgets between conversations.

Make judgment calls. Which bull to use on which cows this year. Whether to extend the grazing season or house early given this autumn's grass cover. Whether to expand the herd given current milk price projections. These are judgment calls that integrate local knowledge, market awareness, and your specific farm system. AI can give you a framework. It cannot make the call.

Build a relationship. Your advisor advocates for you. When something goes wrong with an inspection, when a scheme interpretation is ambiguous, when you need someone who knows your situation to make a case on your behalf — that's a relationship built over years. AI has no stake in your farm.

Be accountable. If a Teagasc advisor gives you wrong advice, there's a professional and institutional relationship that can be held to account. If ChatGPT gets your grant entitlements wrong and you act on it, that's on you.

What Teagasc itself says

Teagasc has been direct in its digital farming strategy — digital tools and AI are positioned as supports to advisory services, not replacements. Their own digital farming programme is built around helping advisors use data tools more effectively, not around removing advisors from the equation.

That's not a defensive position from an organisation protecting its own relevance. It's an honest assessment of where the technology actually is.

The practical question

The farms most likely to get value from AI tools in the next two to three years are the ones that already have a good advisory relationship. AI handles the routine and the administrative. The advisor handles the judgment and the relationship.

If you're currently doing everything by yourself with minimal advisory input, AI tools might give you a useful level-up on the basics. If you're working closely with a Teagasc advisor and a good vet, AI adds efficiency at the edges — it doesn't change what matters at the centre.


This site is not affiliated with Teagasc. FarmAI Ireland is an independent platform. For advisory services, contact Teagasc directly. Find your local Teagasc office →


Read next: Your first 10 ChatGPT prompts as an Irish farmer

Sources

Was this useful?